Evidence-based challenge mapping

E.ON Challenge Coverage

Repository-derived capability clusters · 14 requirements mapped
4Complete
1Partial
8Reference Demo
1Gap
AImplemented platformRunning DT-OS / Twin Factory capability
BReference demonstrationDeterministic synthetic scenario
CProduction integrationClaimed only with concrete evidence
Requirement / interpretationCoverageCapability / componentDemo evidence
EON-COV-01

Asset / twin onboarding

Create a validated, runtime-ready DT-OS twin from an approved definition and engineer-supplied asset and signal information.

CompleteIMPLEMENTED PLATFORM
Definition-assisted and guided twin creation

DT-OS · Twin Factory TF-001, TF-003, TF-006

Twin Factory →

Quick Create: choose, configure, validate, create

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Twin creation and validation service
  • Guided onboarding adapter

Test evidence

  • Twin Factory acceptance tests
  • Guided onboarding acceptance tests

Trust boundary

Engineer-controlled creation from supplied data; no discovery, polling, protocol integration, or automatic classification.

Gap

None for the implemented definition-assisted onboarding scope.

EON-COV-02

Utility equipment export and historian tag list can enter DT-OS

Accept JSON-compatible external asset identity, specifications, metadata, and signal tags for reviewed mapping.

PartialIMPLEMENTED PLATFORM
Governed external data intake and mapping review

Twin Factory TF-003

Twin Factory advanced onboarding →

Advanced mode: analyze mappings, review, finalize

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • External onboarding service

Test evidence

  • External onboarding acceptance tests

Trust boundary

Illustrative E.ON-style identifiers are examples only; input is supplied JSON, not a live utility connection.

Gap

No source-system connector, automatic discovery, or live historian/SCADA ingestion.

Recommended action

Define and validate one governed, read-only source adapter against an approved customer interface and dataset.

EON-COV-03

Digital twin lifecycle / governance

Maintain immutable approved revisions, authoritative lifecycle heads, audit facts, retirement, and engineer identity/reason.

CompleteIMPLEMENTED PLATFORM
Governed revision and retirement lifecycle

Twin Factory TF-004

Twin lifecycle browser →

Browse persisted twins and revision history

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Lifecycle registry and immutable revisions

Test evidence

  • Lifecycle and atomicity acceptance tests

Trust boundary

Approval remains an explicit engineer action; no autonomous changes or operational commands.

Gap

None for the implemented governed lifecycle scope.

EON-COV-04

Topology representation

Represent a deterministic multi-asset reference grid with directed relationships and reusable DT-OS assets.

CompleteIMPLEMENTED PLATFORM
Relationship-graph topology and deterministic traversal

DT-OS relationship graph · Grid Guardian GG-002

Grid Guardian Mission Control →

Reference topology panel

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Eight-asset reference grid
  • DT-OS relationship graph

Test evidence

  • Reference topology acceptance tests

Trust boundary

Synthetic directed graph; not GIS, energized-state analysis, or validated electrical connectivity.

Gap

None for reference topology representation.

EON-COV-05

Synthetic normal operation

Replay stable, synchronous normal telemetry across the eight-asset reference grid.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Deterministic normal measurement generation and history

Grid Guardian GG-003 · DT-OS Measurement and historian

E.ON Challenge Demo →

Phase 1 · Normal Operation

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Normal scenario generator

Test evidence

  • Normal-operation scenario tests

Trust boundary

Fixed synthetic profiles, not live telemetry or a continuous electrical simulation.

Gap

No live utility measurements or validated behavior model.

EON-COV-06

Disturbance injection

Inject named, reproducible transformer, voltage, and communications disturbances into the normal reference scenario.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Deterministic disturbance profiles and reset

Grid Guardian GG-004

E.ON Challenge Demo →

Phase 2 · Disturbance Onset

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Deterministic disturbance engine

Test evidence

  • Disturbance acceptance tests

Trust boundary

Fixed reference inputs; temperature progression is not transformer physics and voltage is not power-flow calculated.

Gap

No field-event ingestion or validated disturbance model.

EON-COV-07

Disturbance impact propagation

Identify a bounded affected set by directional traversal of existing topology relationships.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Topology-aware impact traversal

Grid Guardian GG-004 · DT-OS relationship graph

E.ON Challenge Demo →

Phase 3 · Impact Propagation

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Directional impact traversal

Test evidence

  • Affected-asset traversal tests

Trust boundary

Deterministic topology traversal only; not validated power flow, protection analysis, fault location, or affected-customer calculation.

Gap

No validated electrical-network impact model.

EON-COV-08

Alarms

Create events at explicit reference thresholds and route them through the DT-OS alarm engine with duplicate suppression.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Threshold events and alarm lifecycle

Grid Guardian GG-004 · DT-OS AlarmEngine

E.ON Challenge Demo →

Phase 3 · Alarm progression

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Event-to-alarm flow
  • Platform alarm engine

Test evidence

  • Alarm engine acceptance tests
  • Grid alarm tests

Trust boundary

Alarm thresholds are narrow demonstrator rules, not utility-approved protection settings.

Gap

No production alarm-source integration or utility rule validation.

EON-COV-09

Risk assessment

Explain likelihood, consequence, risk level, rationale, factors, and affected assets using published deterministic rules.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Transparent rule-based risk matrix

Grid Guardian GG-005

Grid Guardian Mission Control →

Risk assessment panel after disturbance injection

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Deterministic risk assessment

Test evidence

  • Risk rule acceptance tests

Trust boundary

Proposal-grade synthetic rules; not certified utility risk analysis or a probability model.

Gap

No validation against utility risk policy or operational history.

EON-COV-10

Explainable recommendations

Present deterministic advisory actions with rationale, expected benefit, cautions, and affected assets.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Rule-based explainable decision support

Grid Guardian GG-005

E.ON Challenge Demo →

Phase 4 · AI Advisory Mitigation

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Advisory recommendation rules

Test evidence

  • Recommendation acceptance tests

Trust boundary

Advisory only; no optimality claim, autonomous decision, switching plan, or command execution.

Gap

No utility-approved recommendation policy or operator workflow integration.

EON-COV-11

Bounded resilience what-if

Compare the overload baseline with one fixed illustrative 5 MW BESS-support projection without mutating operational state.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Non-mutating BESS-support projection

Grid Guardian GG-005

E.ON Challenge Demo →

Phase 4 · Simulate Recommendation

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Bounded what-if projection

Test evidence

  • What-if immutability tests

Trust boundary

Illustrative arithmetic only; not electrochemistry, thermal behavior, optimization, dispatch advice, or power flow.

Gap

No validated resilience simulation model.

EON-COV-12

Simulated recovery

Show a gated, deterministic transition toward nominal values after explicit what-if simulation.

Reference DemoREFERENCE DEMONSTRATION
Frontend-only recovery walkthrough

EON-DEMO-001

E.ON Challenge Demo →

Phase 5 · Recovery & Resilience

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Deterministic five-phase walkthrough

Test evidence

  • Playback and recovery gate tests

Trust boundary

Frontend state transition only; no API call, twin mutation, physical mitigation, automatic isolation, or live command.

Gap

No validated recovery execution or closed-loop control.

EON-COV-13

Persistence / recovery

Persist logical twins, immutable revisions, lifecycle heads, and audit snapshots and reconstruct them through normal authorities.

CompleteIMPLEMENTED PLATFORM
Transactional twin registry persistence and restart recovery

Twin Factory TF-005

Twin lifecycle browser →

Persisted twin discovery and revision history

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

  • Persistent lifecycle composition
  • PostgreSQL and in-memory storage providers

Test evidence

  • Persistence, rollback, and recovery tests

Trust boundary

Persistence preserves approved facts; it does not approve edits, interpret operations, or bypass Twin Factory and AssetManager.

Gap

No general migration runner, concurrent approval locking, or demonstrated production-scale fleet load.

EON-COV-14

E.ON production integration and operational execution

Connect to live E.ON systems and validate production telemetry, analysis, commands, and deployment behavior.

GapPRODUCTION INTEGRATION
No current capability claimed

Not implemented

No demo route

Not demonstrated

Show Evidence

Implementation evidence

No implementation evidence.

Test evidence

No test evidence.

Trust boundary

No live E.ON integration or endorsement; no SCADA/IEC 61850/DNP3 claim, validated power flow, protection study, autonomous control, or command execution.

Gap

Production source integration, engineering validation, security/authorization, operational workflows, and scale evidence are absent.

Recommended action

Agree a bounded pilot interface and acceptance criteria with the utility before implementing any production adapter or operational workflow.